![]() 05/22/2014 at 12:41 • Filed to: None | ![]() | ![]() |
The electron configuration of lead, on the back right calf. Just wondering if anyone here has a better picture of the electron configuration that I can use as a reference. Also, I don't want the tattoo to be too large, which is going to be hard (at least, I think), because of the amount of electrons involved. Opinions oppo?
![]() 05/22/2014 at 12:43 |
|
Is that a lead in image?
![]() 05/22/2014 at 12:43 |
|
Going with the Bohr model over the Schrodinger model eh?
![]() 05/22/2014 at 12:44 |
|
hehe, like the concept. Don't have a better reference...
![]() 05/22/2014 at 12:48 |
|
I'm thinking that one would end up pretty large if you want the letters to be legible.
![]() 05/22/2014 at 12:54 |
|
why not on your foot?
![]() 05/22/2014 at 12:58 |
|
That'll be tough to make clear and small....
You could look into aLewisdot structure, or choose a molecule (octane maybe) and have your choice of several molecular representations. The typical periodic table layout (atomic number, atomic mass, Pb symbol... etc) would be cool ifyou could make it a little more intricate / artsy. Sorry no pictures, just thoughts! Follow this post up with a pic if you end up getting one :)
![]() 05/22/2014 at 13:03 |
|
Why not something like this, from the periodic table? It can be smaller and still stay clear, where as the electron configuration would have to be a lot larger.
![]() 05/22/2014 at 14:50 |
|
No letters, just the electron config.
![]() 05/22/2014 at 14:50 |
|
eh, not too big of a fan of the periodic table one.
![]() 05/22/2014 at 15:26 |
|
And for the left calf:
![]() 05/22/2014 at 16:36 |
|
Why not go with the orbital model? It would probably make a more interesting picture.